This means that, if you can't get to see the exhibition - or maybe were not selected, you can now check out the websites and work of the contemporary painters who have been selected for this major prize in contemporary painting.
That gives you some insight into the sort of painting which gets selected - which is not to say that a different panel might not have different views next time around.
Judges selecting work - up close and personal
As always when doing one of my major artists' website search exercises, I've learned a few things about the current status and state of play of artists' websites in the UK.
Below you can find my notes of observations made this morning during the search - with some suggestions as to how websites might be improved.
- virtually all painters now have websites. By this I mean that an artist’s work can be found on their own website, on a gallery’s website (usually because of their inclusion in an exhibition) or on some sort of compendium website. I noticed a number had got themselves listed on the Saatchi Gallery website - although I used that to find their website proper.
- younger artists are now much more web aware. The very high percentage of selected artists who have websites supports a notion that I’ve had for some time. This is that, whether or not they like it, virtually all younger artists now recognise how vital it is to have their artwork and their identity as an artist/painter represented in some way on the Internet. I’m not saying all the artists selected are young - but virtually all of those who were had websites
- most artists websites could be found pretty quickly and easily. I was absolutely amazed at how many artists’ websites came top of my google search. Mostly these were artists who had chosen to have a website in their own name.
- some websites were very impressive. Much more so than many that I routinely come across. It's worth taking a look just to get some ideas.
- many websites loaded very fast. That’s going to become very important to painters who have sites laden with images now that Google has changed its ranking algorithm to factor in load times. However some artists (or their website designers) had obviously had not checked the size of files which were being loaded - and they didn't load so fast or had too big a site. (I'm a prime culprit on the latter)
- still a lot of Flash about. This one is interesting. Personally if I had Adobe Flash on my website right now I’d be getting rid of it. Two main reasons plus some more which are also very important:
- The iPad resolutely refuses to use Adobe Flash Apple’s argument is that Flash does not meet open system standards and is also a security problem, a resource hog, crashes computers and generally does not work well on mobile systems and wears out batteries very fast! I have to say I see their point. Instead Apple have opted for systems which permit a 10 hour battery life - which means that the both the iPhone and iPad will be used more and more for internet access on a daily basis. If this becomes a really important way for people to access the internet then you’ll definitely want to make sure your website to be capable of being seen on the iPhone and iPad.
- Use of flash means that it’s difficult to provide unique URLs for specific pages on your website or paintings in your portfolio. Which means people can’t share your work with clients, galleries, dealers etc.
- Flash causes privacy problems Enough said?
- Flash does not provide universal accessibility (in the visual disability sense of the word). You can read more about criticisms of Flash here
- I got very frustrated by the fact I couldn't identify specific individual works quickly on very many sites. Slideshows which lack data are not helpful. The virtually total lack of any search facility also did not help.
What to do if you want to have an impact on the internet
- if you get selected for a major art competition...DO make sure that:
- you’ve got a website sorted prior to the announcement of the shortlist, even if it’s just a site with your name as the domain name pointing to the site you want people to look at. I always look for the artist’s own website as an indicator of where I should look for better quality images. Make sure the website has an accurate description and is tagged. Links to your website from some major sites can be helpful in getting it to appear on the first page of Google (although i will personally look through up to 5 pages to try and find the artist's own website.)
- you use the same name for the competition and your website. Those who use variations on their name in different places just cause confusion - and won’t be found.
- you’ve got an image of the chosen work in a pretty prominent place on your website. I was able to identify a tiny number of the works selected. You’d be surprised by how many people failed to make this adjustment and I think this is an area for development amongst most artists. The only time you wouldn’t do this is if there is an embargo on the work having been displayed anywhere else prior to the exhibition. Failure to use news pages and hyperlinks is an 'own goal'. Getting selected for a major art competition is a huge boost for a CV and some restrained boasting is allowed! ;)
- if you really want to remain anonymous and unknown on the internet make sure you're born to parents who give you a very common name. It’s very, very difficult tracking down people with common names. I probably spend more time going backwards and forwards across many sites for people with common names than anything else when trying to tie websites into lists of people selected for an art competition. Unfortunately I almost always end up failing to arrive at any sort of definite conclusion as to which is the correct site. One small trick which a number of artists is to include a word you wish to be closely associated with in the domain name of your website. For example instead of www.another.co.uk you can have www.another-art.co.uk or www.another-paintings.co.uk
- if you want to cause confusion share your name with one or more well known people on the internet. I feel ever so sorry for anybody who has a doppelganger who is big in some aspect completely unrelated to art. Only one thing is worse and that's having the same name as a painter whose artwork you would not wish to be identified with! From my all too frequent detective work on the internet I can tell you what really helps to identify you as you.
- Have a news page and keep it up to date - including announcements of all art competitions you've been selected for.
- Have a comprehensive exhibitions page. I can very often work out who is who by looking at gallery pages and noting which galleries they are exhibiting with and then looking at the artist page on the gallery site.
- Make sure you bio information identifies what is unique about you (eg where you live ior have your studio) also helps enormously.
I'd be very happy to have comments on my observations and thoughts about matters might be improved. Plus do you have any:
- comments on how artists' websites have progressed in recent years
- suggestions as to what improvements artists can make to make their websites even better?